กระบวนการพัฒนาแบบ Agentic ★ Live

Hand the fleet a vague assignment and a disciplined pipeline takes over. The orchestrator restates the brief ("understood as X, proposed split, ETA") with a five-minute review window: your silence is GO, your correction reshapes the plan. Research runs memory-first (the fleet's own knowledge before the web), then an architect produces two or three competing designs, and every design faces an adversarial reviewer whose only job is to attack it: assumptions, cost, failure modes, simpler alternatives. Parallel design directions are cheap: each can run as its own forked session or subagent. Nothing is implemented before you approve the winning architecture, a hard operator gate recorded as a decision document. The plan is then decomposed into claimable fleet tasks with explicit acceptance criteria and resource leases, so agents cannot collide on the same files. Specialised agents do the work (implementer, translator, security auditor, compliance, integrator), each claiming tasks that match its role. Test loops verify against the acceptance criteria written at intake, you accept the result, and the release ships signed. The operator enters exactly three times: brief, architecture, acceptance. Everything else runs agent-side, fully audited.